Cellulite treatment an extensive literature review pubmed ncbi

Cellulite treatment an extensive literature review pubmed ncbi is not well-established

A highly effective and lengthy-term management of cellulite is not well-established. To the understanding, no review has examined the entire selection of treating this problem. We conducted overview of in vivo studies on humans following a key phrases "cellulite" and "treatment." The studies were incorporated based on eligibility criteria. We performed an analysis to estimate the general aftereffect of cellulite treatments from studies. Medline library was screened as much as December 2014 to recognize qualified studies. We incorporated 73 original studies in our review. These were studies, in many of them, only women were employed. Over the studies looked up, 66 tested the potency of a unique treatment performed with no association with other procedures: 11 topical agents, 10 shock-wave therapy, 10 rf, eight laser therapy, five dental therapy, four manual therapeutic massage, three co2 therapy, two compressive therapy, two infrared therapy, one dermabrasion, and 11 devices which use a connection of multiple treatments. Seven papers tested a mix of several treatments. The mean difference of clinical morphologic features and ultrastructural changes between your treated group and also the controlled demonstrated significant heterogeneity between studies. It’s still hard to indicate a unique and efficient single strategy to this problem. Our analysis purposed to acquire a complete summary of the accessible treatments in cellulite reduction.

Cellulite treatment an extensive literature review pubmed ncbi To the understandingResourse: https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/

Webinar: PubMed for Clinicians